This states that a company director must act only in accordance with the company’s constitution, and must only exercise powers for the purposes for which they were conferred.
This duty replaces the previous duty of directors to act ‘in good faith and in the best interests of the company’.
The new principle states that a company director must act in such a way that he or she feels would be most likely to promote the success of the company (ie. its long-term increase in value), for the benefit of its members as a whole. However, the director must also consider a number of other factors, including:
A director has an obligation to exercise independent judgment. This duty is not infringed by acting in accordance with an agreement entered into by the company which restricts the future exercise of discretion by its directors, or by acting in a way which is authorised by the company’s constitution.
This duty codifies the common law rule of duty of care and skill, and imposes both ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ standards. A director must exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence using their own general knowledge, skill and experience (subjective), together with the care, skill and diligence which may reasonably be expected of a person who is carrying out the functions of a director (objective). So a director with significant experience must exercise the appropriate level of diligence in executing their duties, in line with their higher level of expertise.